Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /nfs/c03/h04/mnt/52191/domains/littletownviews.com/html/wordpress/wp-settings.php on line 472

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /nfs/c03/h04/mnt/52191/domains/littletownviews.com/html/wordpress/wp-settings.php on line 487

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /nfs/c03/h04/mnt/52191/domains/littletownviews.com/html/wordpress/wp-settings.php on line 494

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /nfs/c03/h04/mnt/52191/domains/littletownviews.com/html/wordpress/wp-settings.php on line 530

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /nfs/c03/h04/mnt/52191/domains/littletownviews.com/html/wordpress/wp-includes/cache.php on line 103

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /nfs/c03/h04/mnt/52191/domains/littletownviews.com/html/wordpress/wp-includes/query.php on line 21

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /nfs/c03/h04/mnt/52191/domains/littletownviews.com/html/wordpress/wp-includes/theme.php on line 623
Little Town Views

Warning: Parameter 1 to ep_exclude_pages() expected to be a reference, value given in /nfs/c03/h04/mnt/52191/domains/littletownviews.com/html/wordpress/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 163
Defending the Right to Live in a Small Town
  • Archives

  • Views from Gallatin

    Surplus Funds Could Shield Counties
    From Seeking Property Tax Increases

    Posted Sep 12, 2008

    A build-up of surplus funds in the coffers of many Hudson Valley counties could prevent elected officials from resorting to an increase in property taxes to offset expected budget shortfalls from declining sales taxes, reduced state aid and higher energy costs.

    As the region’s economy slows, a windfall of surprisingly high tax receipts over the past several years should give county leaders plenty of flexibility to avoid sticking property owners with higher tax bills—if officials and citizens focus attention on drawing down the large, available cash reserves. Read more

    For the Record

    Durst Watch (4): A Change of Course?

    Posted June 6, 2008   For the Record, Views from GallatinComments

    The sprawling 1,000-unit Durst subdivision proposed on the Dutchess-Columbia border has turned a critical corner with the developer apparently conceding to a drastic reduction in the scale of his original project and a redesign of its layout that would protect environmental resources.

    Now in its fourth year of a public review led by the Pine Plains Town Planning Board, the Durst development remains a long way from approval, but recent statements from the developer, town officials and citizen leaders opposing the plan suggest that a much smaller, more compact subdivision could be up for final consideration by early next year. Read more


    Widewaters Revisited:
    Public Subsidies for Private Commerce

    Posted May 20, 2008   For the Record, Views from GallatinComments

    Columbia County’s recent ruling to deny large tax breaks to the developer of a 565,000-square-foot shopping center is a commendable decision, but it was made for the wrong reasons and it highlights the complexities of offering taxpayer subsidies to promote private commerce in our towns. Read more


    Durst Watch (3): By The Numbers

    Posted March 2, 2008   For the Record, Views from Gallatin2 Comments

    The following is a copy of a letter to the Pine Plains Town Planning Board, the lead agency charged with reviewing the potential impacts of Douglas Durst’s proposed 1,000-home subdivision.

    Ladies and Gentlemen of the Planning Board:

    The Durst Organization has produced for you a labyrinth of numbers in its 1,500-page Environmental Impact Statement, all of which paint a glowing portrait of an environmentally sensitive, financially beneficial windfall for our rural communities. Read more


    Durst Watch (2): Meet the Family

    Posted February 15, 2008   For the Record, Views from Gallatin1 Comment

    In a recent blitzkrieg of mailings to our homes, the Durst Organization extols the glories of its past accomplishments, the smiling family at its helm and the “environmental” virtues of its proposed Carvel development. But the glossy brochures, which offer a slew of misleading environmental claims and wildly inaccurate financial projections, neglect to tell us anything about the key players overseeing the project, their motivations or their track record in guiding comparable developments.

    One of the mass mailings invites us as “dear neighbors” to “meet the Durst family,” and in this and future postings we hope to get to know the Dursts, not their soothing, sepia-toned portraits gracing the brochures, but their capabilities, their character and their business strategy. Read more


    Durst Watch (1): Laying The Groundwork

    Posted February 8, 2008   For the Record, Views from GallatinComments

    We begin our “Durst Watch” series with links to four columns we’ve published since 2005. The first lays out the basic principles for our analysis of the costs and complications of growth in small towns. The other three explore in more detail the primary cause of tax increases brought on by rapid development: the cost of educating children from the new homes who attend the local public schools. Read more


    County Budgets: Dual Perils Ahead

    Posted January 31, 2008   Budget ScorecardComments

    As the slowing U.S. economy curtails municipal tax revenues across the country, many Hudson Valley counties, including Columbia, Dutchess and Rensselaer, are also facing sharp increases in capital spending on roads and buildings.

    The dual perils of declining sales taxes, which comprise 30-50% of a county’s tax revenues, and a large backlog of urgent capital projects will likely put a growing burden on property taxpayers, especially in more heavily indebted counties that cannot borrow much money to fill the fiscal gap. Read more



    Next Page »